| From: | "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | PostgreSQL name |
| Date: | 2008-05-20 05:29:08 |
| Message-ID: | f7f6b4c70805192229m7b78ff9ek2d424c2ad19a680@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
I was trying to find a thread where the discussion relied on the name,
using PostgreSQL or just Postgres.
AFAIK there was an agreement and PostgreSQL *won* that discussion, but
I am unable to find that thread and I may be wrong. This comes to me
because I was trying to push some *advocacy* stuff to the -es mailing
list, and now I am not sure on how to proceeed.
The case is that the .org FAQ explains that both names are just fine,
and I am happy with that, but I seem to recall that PostgreSQL was the
preferred option. Though, if this is the case we should change that
from the site, right?
--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guido Barosio | 2008-05-20 05:52:19 | Re: PostgreSQL name |
| Previous Message | Rob Napier | 2008-05-19 16:22:03 | Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand? |