Re: Cafeconf 2007

From: "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Advocacy List" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cafeconf 2007
Date: 2007-09-28 14:41:46
Message-ID: f7f6b4c70709280741l82fade4hf2a70a1b88cd27d2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Thanks Josh,

Regarding the "Default install", my idea is to explain the big gap
between both engines from a fresh and default install. This gap will
"stdout" things more clearly rather than just saying "this engine is
fecking far better", letting the students/public arrive to a clear
understanding in order to make better decitions in the future.

For instance:

"CREATE TABLE (a serial, b varchar);"

Teacher: "You pupil, can you let me know the differences between the
two implementations?"

So far, that's the idea, to introduce a SWOT analysis based on this mindset.

thanks for the docs!

On 9/28/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Guido,
>
> Heh, now you see the uselessness of the PostgreSQL-Advocacy list. If
> it's not about Postgres vs. PostgreSQL vs. MySQL, you don't get an answer.
>
> So, here's some useful information:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.83
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.84
>
> Also, I'm concerned ... what do you mean by "default install"?
>
> --Josh
>

--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-09-28 15:28:46 Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Previous Message Gavin M. Roy 2007-09-28 14:32:56 Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.