Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem?

From: geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu
To: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem?
Date: 1999-05-07 15:25:35
Message-ID: emacs-smtp-6098-14131-1519-277657@export.andrew.cmu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Then <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com> spoke up and said:
> I will try and come to terms with the code to try and add some of these
> features myself, I've just spent a few hours browsing the code, but
> there is certainly a big learning curve there, especially as the doco is
> minimal. But I'll see what I can do.

Great! It's wonderful to see new talent coming on board!

--
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-05-07 15:58:34 Re: Nasty resource-leak problem in sort code
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 1999-05-07 15:21:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re:pg_dump barfs?