Re: [HACKERS] Some cleanups/enhancements

From: Brian E Gallew <geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some cleanups/enhancements
Date: 1998-02-11 17:02:09
Message-ID: emacs-smtp-10993-13537-55697-459972@export.andrew.cmu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Then <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> spoke up and said:
> > - Add a template for linux-elf-586 with (optimized) code for a Pentium
> > (gcc 2.8.0 not only supports -m486 but also -mpentium and -mpentiumpro).
> > Why not use template names similar to the output of config.guess (maybe
> > with some symbolic links)?

IMHO, none of the gcc-specific optimization switches belong in any
templates. If you're using gcc on a pentium, and your version
supportes -mpentium, then it should be in the SPECS file in your gcc
installation. Admittedly, this presumes a certain clue level on the
part of the gcc installer/maintainer, but it reduces the clutter level
with templates somewhat.

- --

=====================================================================
| "If you're all through trying to burn the field down, will you |
| kindly get up and tell me why you're sitting in a fruit field, |
| stark naked, frying peaches?" |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)andrew(dot)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQBVAwUBNOHZkIdzVnzma+gdAQEg7QH+MOviZ+pcq5wdpE1d7tK3yB2Ai/03qGti
7cBxzMQLq82g1/5wT+lXm9Rh3plbyvTBCUpU48kpXTYAYjeAvVIzzQ==
=C0DN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen van Vianen 1998-02-11 17:10:20 Re: [HACKERS] Some cleanups/enhancements
Previous Message Andrew Martin 1998-02-11 16:53:50 Expected regression output from Irix5