From: | Brian E Gallew <geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Some cleanups/enhancements |
Date: | 1998-02-11 17:02:09 |
Message-ID: | emacs-smtp-10993-13537-55697-459972@export.andrew.cmu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Then <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> spoke up and said:
> > - Add a template for linux-elf-586 with (optimized) code for a Pentium
> > (gcc 2.8.0 not only supports -m486 but also -mpentium and -mpentiumpro).
> > Why not use template names similar to the output of config.guess (maybe
> > with some symbolic links)?
IMHO, none of the gcc-specific optimization switches belong in any
templates. If you're using gcc on a pentium, and your version
supportes -mpentium, then it should be in the SPECS file in your gcc
installation. Admittedly, this presumes a certain clue level on the
part of the gcc installer/maintainer, but it reduces the clutter level
with templates somewhat.
- --
=====================================================================
| "If you're all through trying to burn the field down, will you |
| kindly get up and tell me why you're sitting in a fruit field, |
| stark naked, frying peaches?" |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)andrew(dot)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQBVAwUBNOHZkIdzVnzma+gdAQEg7QH+MOviZ+pcq5wdpE1d7tK3yB2Ai/03qGti
7cBxzMQLq82g1/5wT+lXm9Rh3plbyvTBCUpU48kpXTYAYjeAvVIzzQ==
=C0DN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen van Vianen | 1998-02-11 17:10:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Some cleanups/enhancements |
Previous Message | Andrew Martin | 1998-02-11 16:53:50 | Expected regression output from Irix5 |