Re: PostgreSQL rebranding

From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Date: 2006-10-14 19:12:49
Message-ID: egrcre$2198$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Should we have this information on our web site somewhere?
>
> I just added an initial version of a list on the new wiki. There is
> still plenty missing as I just wanted to get something up there quickly:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php/pgwiki:Variations

Ok finally had time to work on this some more .. this time on my own wiki:
http://oss.backendmedia.com/RDBMS/PgSQLVariants

I am not sure on some of the information (especially licenses). Also I
am not sure what other relevant information should be on there. Maybe a
separate column for the company name or a column with information on the
availability (from when til when the db was available). Maybe there are
some variants missing?

Please just add a comment on the wiki or reply here and I will add it to
the table. If someone points me that the necessary steps to get this
list added to the official site I would also be willing to write the
necessary patch.

regards,
Lukas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cornelia Boenigk 2006-10-14 20:07:01 full disjunction in press kit for 8.2
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-13 17:37:36 Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-14 21:07:35 Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-14 18:58:15 Please change sponsor banner for