Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Date: 2016-03-23 20:21:57
Message-ID: eb4f07b1-b15e-41e0-b98e-5a2974d77e14@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes wrote:
> More than you think.
>
> I doubt you want to propose removing features that make developing new
> features harder, or do you? :)

I want to understand the situation. You may want to make the build ecpg
optional. Personally, I want to.

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-03-23 20:24:17 Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-03-23 20:18:56 Re: PostgreSQL 9.6 behavior change with set returning (funct).*