Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC

From: Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Date: 2006-06-22 18:03:13
Message-ID: e7em10$baa$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark wrote:

> There are other solutions too. I never used DB2 but I was led to believe they
> used their transaction log to retrieve old versions of the records. Someone
> else here claimed DB2 didn't implement MVCC at all so perhaps that's wrong
> though.

I would be suprised giving this paper:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/data/pubs/papers/readconsistency.pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Diogo Biazus 2006-06-22 18:03:45 Re: xlog viewer proposal
Previous Message Diogo Biazus 2006-06-22 17:57:16 Re: xlog viewer proposal