Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Debugging question ...

From: "Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Robert Bernabe" <rbernabe(at)sandmansystems(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Debugging question ...
Date: 2007-11-09 19:27:17
Message-ID: e7e0a2570711091127y1774b685tadc473d1aacf9139@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Nov 8, 2007 11:32 PM, Robert Bernabe <rbernabe(at)sandmansystems(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice...although there is no choice but to try to port
> over since we have 3k MS Sql stored procs already in the production
> system...1st step seems to be to evaluate the performance of PG vs MS
> SQL in our systems and the only way to do that is to port the massive
> stored procs into PG and time the performance...

At some point, porting functions directly will be the way to go. But
make sure you've gotten used to pl/pgsql first, so you know what
changes to make in the porting process.

-Josh/eggyknap

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Brad NicholsonDate: 2007-11-09 20:22:35
Subject: Re: Autovacuum - what does it actually do?
Previous:From: Mija LeeDate: 2007-11-09 18:13:23
Subject: Re: references to variable in another schema

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group