On Nov 8, 2007 11:32 PM, Robert Bernabe <rbernabe(at)sandmansystems(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice...although there is no choice but to try to port
> over since we have 3k MS Sql stored procs already in the production
> system...1st step seems to be to evaluate the performance of PG vs MS
> SQL in our systems and the only way to do that is to port the massive
> stored procs into PG and time the performance...
At some point, porting functions directly will be the way to go. But
make sure you've gotten used to pl/pgsql first, so you know what
changes to make in the porting process.
In response to
pgsql-novice by date
|Next:||From: Brad Nicholson||Date: 2007-11-09 20:22:35|
|Subject: Re: Autovacuum - what does it actually do?|
|Previous:||From: Mija Lee||Date: 2007-11-09 18:13:23|
|Subject: Re: references to variable in another schema|