| From: | "Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Bernabe" <rbernabe(at)sandmansystems(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Debugging question ... |
| Date: | 2007-11-09 19:27:17 |
| Message-ID: | e7e0a2570711091127y1774b685tadc473d1aacf9139@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Nov 8, 2007 11:32 PM, Robert Bernabe <rbernabe(at)sandmansystems(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice...although there is no choice but to try to port
> over since we have 3k MS Sql stored procs already in the production
> system...1st step seems to be to evaluate the performance of PG vs MS
> SQL in our systems and the only way to do that is to port the massive
> stored procs into PG and time the performance...
At some point, porting functions directly will be the way to go. But
make sure you've gotten used to pl/pgsql first, so you know what
changes to make in the porting process.
-Josh/eggyknap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brad Nicholson | 2007-11-09 20:22:35 | Re: Autovacuum - what does it actually do? |
| Previous Message | Mija Lee | 2007-11-09 18:13:23 | Re: references to variable in another schema |