Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS

From: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Date: 2009-02-09 16:36:00
Message-ID: e51f66da0902090836p6c4e788dx8610576c96f33d4f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/9/09, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > But now that I learned that ALTER TABLE WITHOUT OIDS either causes bugs
> > or requires table rewrite, it turned from minor annoyance to big annoyance.
> > So I'd like have a reasonable path for getting rid of them, which we don't
> > have currently.
>
> We've had SET WITHOUT OIDS since 7.3 or thereabouts. Anybody who hasn't
> applied it in all that time either does not care, or actually needs the
> OIDs and will be unhappy if we arbitrarily remove the feature.

Sure I did not care. Because I thought I can get rid of them
anytime I wanted. But it seems it's not the case...

We've set default_with_oids = false, for quite a long time. But there
are still tables remaining with oids. And this discussion showed it
now easy to get rid of them.

I can patch Postgres myself, but I was thinking maybe others want also
some solution.

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Lister 2009-02-09 16:37:11 database corruption help
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-02-09 16:32:51 Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS