Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0

From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0
Date: 2008-07-01 15:33:01
Message-ID: e51f66da0807010833j1129d25dvc2dbb01e566b337f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/1/08, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> If you want a simple example of wide character use look at
> oracle_compat.c::upper() which calls str_toupper() in CVS HEAD.

ATM I'm looking at str_tolower/upper internal implementation.

They do:

workspace[curr_char] = towlower(workspace[curr_char]);

where workspace is wchar_t but towlower() operates on wint_t.

Is such inconsistency ok?

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-01 15:36:41 Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-07-01 15:25:07 Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0