| From: | "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Darcy Buskermolen" <darcyb(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to user level |
| Date: | 2006-07-28 21:13:52 |
| Message-ID: | e51f66da0607281413n6b72f275j349257f1c752de31@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 7/27/06, Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> In one of those 3am lightbulbs I belive I have a way to make use of the 64-bit
> XID counter and still maintain the ability to have backwards compatibility.
> Is there any chance you could break this patch up into the 2 separate
> componenets that Hannu mentions, and rework the XID stuff into
> TransactionIdAdvance as per tom's recommendation. And in the meantime I'll
> pencil out the slony stuff to utilize this.
Yes, I can. As I am on vacation right now, my computer-time is rather
unstable, hopefully I can do it on weekend.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-07-28 21:43:23 | Re: On-disk bitmap index patch |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-07-28 20:58:18 | Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-07-28 22:05:03 | Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-28 20:42:17 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |