Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: More frame options in window functions

From: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More frame options in window functions
Date: 2010-01-13 12:37:43
Message-ID: e08cc0401001130437m5e1c7adckaea6acd15f8c8cbf@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/1/5 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2009/12/31 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> Attached is the fix pointed out in the previous CommitFest plus RANGE
>> offset support.
>
> Improved version attached. In this revision I fixed type mismatch case
> like "ORDER BY int4_data RANGE BETWEEN int8_data PRECEDING ...".
>
> Update of comments and fix typos in documents are also included.

Fix some trivial things and synced with HEAD.

I've came up with using "upper" and "lower" instead of "start" and
"end" for window frame bounds. The upper/lower is more beautiful since
two have same length but start/end is used since it was introduced.
Comments?

Regards,


-- 
Hitoshi Harada

Attachment: more_frame_options.20100113.patch.gz
Description: application/x-gzip (23.3 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2010-01-13 13:38:07
Subject: Re: patch to implement ECPG side tracing / tracking ...
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-01-13 12:34:05
Subject: Re: Incrementally Updated Backups and restartpoints

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group