| From: | "Ricardo Stuven" <rstuven(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Performance MSSql vs PostgreSql |
| Date: | 2006-05-09 21:16:20 |
| Message-ID: | deeb8d8e0605091416v3a0296fakd468a5f83623ecbd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Please, see http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=179064
This is one of the few performance comparisons between PostgreSQL and
MS SQL I have seen, and at first sight it seems too unfavorable to
PgSQL... Maybe there is a bottleneck in the ODBC driver, Foxpro,
VMWare or Windows, really I don't know, I'm not an expert, but I would
not lightly believe in such results, especially for such queries that
are so simple. However, a casual reader or someone wanting to choose
between PostgreSQL and MS SQL could base his/her decision on that
results.
You may want to give the author (and readers, of course) some comments
to explain the results or to improve the benchmarks.
Regards.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matteo Beccati | 2006-05-09 23:04:40 | Banners on postgresql.org not running on pgsql? ;) |
| Previous Message | rstuven | 2006-05-04 00:16:31 | Performance MSSql vs PostgreSql |