| From: | "Xiao Meng" <mx(dot)cogito(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, "Kenneth Marshall" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving |
| Date: | 2008-07-23 02:57:12 |
| Message-ID: | ded849dd0807221957t50939480r4423f03a8565180b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm sorry for delay reply. I couldn't get access to the internet these
days for some reason.
I do apologize for my rough work and very bad readability. I posted it
in a hurry and I didn't mean to cause the reader so much
inconvenience.
I'll NEVER make such a mistake again.
Currently, I've made some optimization Tom advised and removed the
macro HASHVALUE_ONLY. And I'm working on fixing the problem that it
crashed in large data set.
I'll post a new patch later.
Thank you for all your advice and test.
--
Best Regards,
Xiao Meng
DKERC, Harbin Institute of Technology, China
Gtalk: mx(dot)cogito(at)gmail(dot)com
MSN: cnEnder(at)live(dot)com
http://xiaomeng.yo2.cn
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Xiao Meng | 2008-07-23 02:57:27 | Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving |
| Previous Message | Jens-Wolfhard Schicke | 2008-07-23 00:49:34 | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication |