Re: The OS Command for pg_hotbackup -- Use lvmsnapshot instead of tar cvzf

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Arnold, Sandra" <ArnoldS(at)osti(dot)gov>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The OS Command for pg_hotbackup -- Use lvmsnapshot instead of tar cvzf
Date: 2010-03-02 19:20:10
Message-ID: dcc563d11003021120u2cc0ec95ud8802126521e442c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Arnold, Sandra <ArnoldS(at)osti(dot)gov> wrote:
> I am currently using the pg_hotbackup Perl script to backup my production
> PostgreSQL database.  However, the next production database is going to be
> close to a terrabyte in size.  We feel that a tar cvzf command is not the
> correct OS backup solution to use.  Instead we would like to use
> lvmsnapshot.  Is anyone using the pg_hotbackup script but instead of the tar
> cvzf OS command are they using lvmsnapshot?
>
> Or, is anyone using lvmsnapshot and doing point-in-time recoveries?

I do not run my databases on LVM because, at least in the past, LVM
did not properly honor fsync / write barrier commands. I don't know
if this has since been fixed. If your transaction rate on LVM is
unnaturally higher than it should / could be, then suspect it is not
fsyncing, and putting your data on it is putting it at risk.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-03-02 19:22:09 Re: Very Dangerous bug in XA connection pooling and SL EJBs with jboss-4.2.3 & latest postgresql-8.4-701.jdbc3.jar
Previous Message Chander Ganesan 2010-03-02 18:09:33 Re: The OS Command for pg_hotbackup -- Use lvmsnapshot instead of tar cvzf

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-03-02 19:24:06 Re: The OS Command for pg_hotbackup -- Use lvmsnapshot instead of tar cvzf
Previous Message Ben Chobot 2010-03-02 18:47:05 Re: disable triggers isolated to transaction only?