From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kiswono Prayogo <kiswono(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Best Replication Tool |
Date: | 2010-02-08 03:32:46 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d11002071932r136b9d3eyc004fd0452ef24c4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Kiswono Prayogo <kiswono(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi, i'm really new to postgresql replication, was there any
> replication tool for postgresql that can do real-time replication from
> 1 database to ~3-10 database (on the other machines) with little
> overhead for load balancing purpose?
Well, you're not telling us how much traffic you're looking at or how
powerful your servers will be. Where I work we have two large master
servers (lots of SAS drives on power hardware RAID controllers with
battery backed cache) which are our master and slave-master, so to
speak, then we currently have two, but may have more, slaves synced
off of the slave-master machine. We use slony. It works well enough,
but there are some issues with large numbers of db objects (lots of
tables / indexes / schemas) that we've run into with it that are
making me pull some hair out, and I haven't had time to troubleshoot
them.
Overall though, it's a quite capable system, and once it's setup and
running it's fast and stable.
There's also londiste, bucardo, and a few others worth looking at.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Steben | 2010-02-08 15:40:59 | ctrl-c - is it safe to kill a query? |
Previous Message | Kiswono Prayogo | 2010-02-08 03:22:12 | Best Replication Tool |