From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Schuchardt <d(dot)schuchardt(at)prodat-sql(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Access a Field / Column of a resultset by Number |
Date: | 2009-11-28 06:08:15 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10911272208l2fbb8d2dl5300a97f1d3e976d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Daniel Schuchardt
<d(dot)schuchardt(at)prodat-sql(dot)de> wrote:
> thats exactly the same i'm looking for:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-07/msg00458.php
>
> (todo list for plpgsql)
>
> *Server-Side Languages
> *PL/pgSQL
> *
> *[D] Allow listing of record column names, and access to record columns *via
> variables, e.g. columns := r.(*), tval2 := r.(colname)
> *
> *Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection
>
>
> is that is possible in any pl* language?
Yes, if the language has the architecture to handle it. plpgsql
doesn't right now. pltcl, plperl, and plain old C functions can
examine records and do dynamic stuff with them. Any attempt at doing
dynamic queries right now in plpgsql leads to madness, or so I've been
told.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | admin@buydirect.net.au | 2009-11-28 10:46:18 | Locale query |
Previous Message | Paul Ramsey | 2009-11-28 00:28:05 | Re: incorrect restore from pg_dumpall |