| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres-Admin list <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "dudes(at)turbocorp(dot)com" <dudes(at)turbocorp(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 32bit and 64bit cluster with shared data silo |
| Date: | 2009-08-21 17:50:34 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10908211050p2f0af2fbpb0cac75b5bfc0348@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Geoffrey<lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> wrote:
> We have a two node cluster and we are planning on adding a third. Question
> is, we want the third machine to be more robust, thus we want more memory,
> hence we would like to run 64bit.
>
> Will this be a problem if our two current clustered machines are 32bit? Our
> data resides on a fiber connected shared data silo.
Assuming each cluster has its own data store (postmasters can't share
that between machines) then there should be no problem.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-08-21 17:51:05 | Re: 32bit and 64bit cluster with shared data silo |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-08-21 17:47:13 | Re: select count is too slow |