Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 32bit and 64bit cluster with shared data silo

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres-Admin list <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "dudes(at)turbocorp(dot)com" <dudes(at)turbocorp(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 32bit and 64bit cluster with shared data silo
Date: 2009-08-21 17:50:34
Message-ID: dcc563d10908211050p2f0af2fbpb0cac75b5bfc0348@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Geoffrey<lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> wrote:
> We have a two node cluster and we are planning on adding a third. Question
> is, we want the third machine to be more robust, thus we want more memory,
>  hence we would like to run 64bit.
>
> Will this be a problem if our two current clustered machines are 32bit?  Our
> data resides on a fiber connected shared data silo.

Assuming each cluster has its own data store (postmasters can't share
that between machines) then there should be no problem.

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2009-08-21 17:51:05
Subject: Re: 32bit and 64bit cluster with shared data silo
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2009-08-21 17:47:13
Subject: Re: select count is too slow

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group