From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Patrick Desjardins <mrdesjardins(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Emanuel Calvo Franco <postgres(dot)arg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [GENERAL] ERROR: XX001: could not read block 2354 of relation… |
Date: | 2009-04-02 17:48:35 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10904021048u36b41a1o759910a215024ff6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Patrick Desjardins
<mrdesjardins(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Humm, they want to close the AntiVirus for 1 night not anymore. Do you think
> that if we take out the database directory of the scan that it will solve
> the problem or it really need to have no antivirus on the server? They
> really want to keep it...
Yes, telling it to ignore SHOULD make everything ok.
As previously mentioned,
1: some anti-virus products do not behave properly when told to ignore things.
2: database servers should be isolated in such a way that active virus
scanning should be unnecessary.
3: your IT department needs to practice good change approval. This
means they need to test this on a non-production server first to make
sure their idea is a good one. Obviously this was not done before
applying anti-virus software so they have one strike against them
already. If they won't turn it off and test it on a test server
first, you should ask your manager to hire a professional to replace
whoever didn't test this first.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-02 18:04:41 | Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array with empty input |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-04-02 17:42:03 | Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array with empty input |