| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Tim Uckun" <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Data Replication |
| Date: | 2008-12-11 04:39:44 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10812102039y7d81dbbard271995b9367da68@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 20:41 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Log shipping doesn't really lends itself to switching back and forth
>> between masters and slaves.
>
> Really? It seems to me that you can make a base backup just as fast as
> you can sync from slony (or replicator or whatever).
sorry if my post wasn't clear. slony's not really any better. I don't
think that there's any replication for pgsql that's easy to do that
in. Is there?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phillip Berry | 2008-12-11 04:48:22 | Re: Startup process thrashing |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-12-11 04:20:21 | Re: Startup process thrashing |