Re: quickly getting the top N rows

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: quickly getting the top N rows
Date: 2007-10-04 20:35:46
Message-ID: dcc563d10710041335u3891221dw8f17c72536ea427d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 10/4/07, Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > You're being about as clear as mud here, except that you obviously lied
> > about what you were doing in your first message. If you have a planner
> > problem, show us the *exact* query, the *exact* table definition, and
> > unfaked EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.
>
> I didn't realize that simplification was viewed as so sinister, but
> thanks, I'll remember that in the future.

It's not sinister, it's counterproductive and wastes people's time.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2007-10-04 21:01:45 Re: quickly getting the top N rows
Previous Message Ben 2007-10-04 20:34:22 Re: quickly getting the top N rows