Re: Testing with concurrent sessions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> We could even bundle DBI and DBD::Pg to ensure that the minimum versions
>> are there.

> As a packager, my reaction to that is "over my dead body". We have
> enough trouble keeping our own software up to date, and pretty much
> every external component that we've started to bundle has been a
> disaster from a maintenance standpoint. (Examples: the zic database
> is constant work and yet almost never up to date; the snowball stemmer
> never gets updated.)

As a counterargument, I'll point out that this won't be as critical
as zic, especially if we're talking about an additional/optional
set of tests. Also, Tim Bunce and I are right here, so the maintenance
should not be that bad (and I'd hazard that a lot more people in
the community know Perl/DBI than zic or stemmers).

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001071315
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktGJNQACgkQvJuQZxSWSshoHwCg9urTTT19m55soiIjuYKKuB5L
PjYAoJbDAe7j4xsxsSFfVEkYDFpTjKE9
=48oW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----