Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2010-1-25

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> Can we make the list of moderators public somewhere? I think
> personal harassment (by submitters) is the only way this is
> going to work.

Huh? Since when has personal harassment worked in an all-volunteer
project? For the record, I'm a moderator, but there are times when
I'm busy with other things and may not get to the moderation for
a while. That's life. Harassing me won't change that. *Paying* me
to moderate would be the only thing that would change things. (no,
I don't want to be paid, just making a point)

I'm 100% on board with getting more moderators. That's the correct
answer. It would also help a lot if there was a web page that listed
the current number of unmoderated things. Right now if I go to the
page I have no way of knowing which items need attention, and which
may have been handled by other moderators, without clicking through
each and every section. That's a big inefficient time suck.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001261106
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktfExUACgkQvJuQZxSWSshuEgCg43AomYGpquyQJhwvNhbfdFOb
Q10AoMDrTzdi5LrAJg9y6e5lUd5hpy3a
=k1Kb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----