From: | "Relaxin" <me(at)yourhouse(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | PostgresSQL vs. Firebird |
Date: | 2005-07-14 07:19:34 |
Message-ID: | db53m4$520$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Before I ask, I don't want to start a war.
Can someone here give me an honest opinion of how PostgresSQL (PG) is better
than Firebird on Windows?
I've just recently started reading the Firebird NG and a poster over there
has brought up some serious issues with Firebird, but they seem to not take
the issues seriously.
I first wanted to go with Firebird for 2 reasons...
Very easy to configure and very easy to install.
I assumed that the database worked ok, but I'm not so sure now.
So, I've decided to give PG a try...I've downloaded it, but haven't
installed it yet.
So any provable information that you can provide as to why/how PG is
better/faster/easier/reliable than Firebird would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2005-07-14 08:03:10 | Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Dmitri Bichko | 2005-07-14 07:08:41 | Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL? |