Re: why not kill -9 postmaster

From: "Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet(dot)dhaliwal01(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Ian Harding" <iharding(at)destinydata(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Shane Ambler" <pgsql(at)007marketing(dot)com>, "Andreas Seltenreich" <andreas+pg(at)gate450(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
Date: 2006-10-21 22:56:58
Message-ID: d86a77ef0610211556u6c2de32bhec7df82f6ab5d9a9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

what type of start up script are you talking about here?

On 10/21/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Ian Harding" <iharding(at)destinydata(dot)com> writes:
> > On 10/20/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Personally I think the TIP that's really needed is "never remove
> >> postmaster.pid by hand".
>
> > When the machine crashes, don't you have to remove the pid file by
> > hand to get the Postgres to start? I seem to remember having to do
> > that....
>
> Given a properly written startup script and a reasonably recent
> postmaster, that shouldn't be necessary. In any case, retrying the
> startup script is a *far* safer habit to develop than manually removing
> the pidfile (and putting an "rm" into the script itself is folly of the
> first magnitude).
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-10-21 22:58:24 Wordpress & PostgreSQL ...
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-10-21 21:25:34 Call for translations