R-tree, order by, limit

From: "Anton Belyaev" <anton(dot)belyaev(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: R-tree, order by, limit
Date: 2008-09-21 13:23:48
Message-ID: d7e834b0809210623h7c2b3b55i1def9eebad6f7071@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello,

I am implementing a map application. There are towns with altitude,
longitude and population.
One of the tasks is to be able to query N biggest (by population)
towns within a rectangle.

Something like (maybe the syntax in not quite right, but the idea is obvious):
SELECT * FROM towns where alt1 <= alt <= alt2 AND long1 <= long <=
long2 ORDER BY population LIMIT 10;

If I create an R-tree index on coordinates (alt, long) this will speed
up the query significantly. But it is still far from optimal: Despite
we need only 10 biggest towns, all towns in the rectangle specified
will be examined.

What if we include population into R-tree index? This index will
handle a 3D space with coordinates (alt, long, population).
Will this 3D index perform better than that 2D index?

In fact, I lack some details on how Postges handles ORDER_BY and LIMIT
inside R-tree indexes.
Extensive answers and links are appreciated.

Thanks.
Anton.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Volkan YAZICI 2008-09-21 13:57:00 Re: R-tree, order by, limit
Previous Message Sven Marcel Buchholz 2008-09-21 09:52:44 Re: PDF Documentation for 8.3?