Re: Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE
Date: 2017-01-27 22:53:33
Message-ID: d67f23b8-6a64-1ae0-05c0-a4645d2ab63b@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/26/17 1:20 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> Ok, but doing in that way the syntax would be:
>
> COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE IS 'comment';

Yes, that's right. We also have ALTER USER CURRENT_USER already.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter van Hardenberg 2017-01-27 23:01:15 Re: GSoC 2017
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-27 22:50:31 Re: WIP: About CMake v2