| From: | Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pierre C <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SSD + RAID |
| Date: | 2010-02-23 12:07:24 |
| Message-ID: | d4e11e981002230407pd4b5888ibb3181c6f8471b06@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Pierre C <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> wrote:
> Note that's power draw per bit. dram is usually much more densely
>> packed (it can be with fewer transistors per cell) so the individual
>> chips for each may have similar power draws while the dram will be 10
>> times as densely packed as the sram.
>>
>
> Differences between SRAM and DRAM :
>
> [lots of informative stuff]
>
I've been slowly reading the paper at
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/cpumemory.pdf which has a big section on
SRAM vs DRAM with nice pretty pictures. While not strictly relevant its been
illuminating and I wanted to share.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yeb Havinga | 2010-02-23 12:18:19 | Re: Slow query: table iteration (8.3) |
| Previous Message | Pierre C | 2010-02-23 11:49:52 | Re: SSD + RAID |