From: | Johan <beest1967(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Saunders <dsaunders99(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pnewman(at)tripoint(dot)co(dot)uk |
Subject: | Re: Disk Keeper |
Date: | 2005-12-01 19:43:27 |
Message-ID: | d4310abd0512011143s17fda65ds41090ae9163e23fa@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
If you feel the need to defragment your database files you need to set them
up differently. Using partitions on your hard disks and smart use of
tablespaces you can create a setup that needs no defragmenting.
Besides, on larger disks defragmentation isn't even necessary.
On 12/1/05, David Saunders <dsaunders99(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has any body got any experience of using Disk Keeper on Windows (On line
> defragmenter) on the same machine as a PostgreSQL server. We are proposing
> to use it but do not know if it will have any adverse effects on the
> overall
> performance of the Postgres Server. If anybody is already using this or
> any
> other defragmentation tool can you let me know.
>
> Many Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Caduto | 2005-12-01 19:59:55 | Re: Function returning SETOF |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 19:31:23 | Re: interval behaviour |