Re: Disk Keeper

From: Johan <beest1967(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Saunders <dsaunders99(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pnewman(at)tripoint(dot)co(dot)uk
Subject: Re: Disk Keeper
Date: 2005-12-01 19:43:27
Message-ID: d4310abd0512011143s17fda65ds41090ae9163e23fa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

If you feel the need to defragment your database files you need to set them
up differently. Using partitions on your hard disks and smart use of
tablespaces you can create a setup that needs no defragmenting.

Besides, on larger disks defragmentation isn't even necessary.

On 12/1/05, David Saunders <dsaunders99(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has any body got any experience of using Disk Keeper on Windows (On line
> defragmenter) on the same machine as a PostgreSQL server. We are proposing
> to use it but do not know if it will have any adverse effects on the
> overall
> performance of the Postgres Server. If anybody is already using this or
> any
> other defragmentation tool can you let me know.
>
> Many Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

  • Disk Keeper at 2005-12-01 15:14:30 from David Saunders

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2005-12-01 19:59:55 Re: Function returning SETOF
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-01 19:31:23 Re: interval behaviour