From: | NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Docs" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Date: | 2007-11-29 15:05:07 |
Message-ID: | d3c4af540711290705q35ea51cdkfaa94b0c07a1aecc@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
>
> > The argument I made for keeping the example around is not dependent on
> > the assumption that using a rule is a good idea. It's dependent on
> > the established fact that we have recommended that in prior releases,
> > and therefore people are going to be seeing that construct in real
> > databases.
>
> And they could refer back to the older version of the documentation for
> it. In fact, we should mention that in the patch:
>
> <note><para>If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please
> refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning</para></note>
>
+1
Regards,
Nikhils
--
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2007-11-29 15:29:38 | Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-29 06:41:54 | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2007-11-29 15:29:38 | Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-11-29 14:14:20 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible? |