Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)

From: "Joeseph P(dot) Blow" <jpblow(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Date: 2004-12-06 01:59:32
Message-ID: cp0ebs$4gj$2@herekittykitty.databasix.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 01:24:46 +0000 (GMT), bhk(at)dsl(dot)co(dot)uk (Brian
{Hamilton Kelly}) wrote:

>On Saturday, in article
> <tto3r01vijeu2n9ggr6r5pl3p36bcmn1nf(at)4ax(dot)com>
> robert(dot)mcclenon(at)verizon(dot)net "Robert McClenon" wrote:
>
>> I think that the term that is occasionally used is that the hierarchy
>> has a hierarchy czar. That is the most straightforward way to manage
>> a hierarchy. I did not say that it was the best or the worst, only
>> the most straightforward. It doesn't address the question of what
>> happens if the czar disappears, for instance.
>
>Seventy-five years' rule by Soviet?

Russia takes over Usenet. Film at eleven.

--
Just your average Joe.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guy Rouillier 2004-12-06 02:21:16 Re: Select distinct sorting all rows 8.0rc1
Previous Message OpenMacNews 2004-12-06 01:55:04 Re: initdb error: "could not identify current directory"