Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics

From: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
To: david(at)lang(dot)hm
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Date: 2010-03-02 22:26:54
Message-ID: cone.1267568814.896051.32557.1000@shelca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

david(at)lang(dot)hm writes:

> what filesystem is being used. There is a thread on the linux-kernel
> mailing list right now showing that ext4 seems to top out at ~360MB/sec
> while XFS is able to go to 500MB/sec+

EXT3 on Centos 5.4

Plan to try and see if I have time with the new machines to try FreeBSD+ZFS.
ZFS supposedly makes good use of memory and the new machines will have 72GB
of RAM.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2010-03-02 22:46:19 Re: Query slowing down significantly??
Previous Message david 2010-03-02 22:10:05 Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics