Re: Logical Replication WIP

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication WIP
Date: 2016-11-04 02:05:49
Message-ID: cb18f96c-b124-3502-568f-affb86d37217@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/24/16 9:22 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> I also split out the libpqwalreceiver rewrite to separate patch which
> does just the re-architecture and does not really add new functionality.
> And I did the re-architecture bit differently based on the review.

That looks good to me, and it appears to address the previous discussions.

I wouldn't change walrcv_xxx to walrcvconn_xxx. If we're going to have
macros to hide the internals, we might as well keep the names the same.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-11-04 02:59:47 Re: Confusing docs about GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-11-04 01:45:28 Re: Logical Replication WIP