Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?
Date: 2019-02-13 03:10:32
Message-ID: ca67bf0f-2b22-495c-19a3-76e66c822d69@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/12/19 5:45 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
>> On Feb 12, 2019, at 5:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> The part about having a unified release-note archive somewhere else is
>> still WIP. The ball is in the web team's court on that, I think.
>
> Yes - we are going to try one thing with the existing way we load docs to try to avoid
> additional structural changes. If that doesn’t work, we will reconvene
> and see what we need to do.

I've proposed a patch for this here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e0f09c9a-bd2b-862a-d379-601dfabc8969%40postgresql.org

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2019-02-13 03:13:00 Re: 2019-02-14 Press Release Draft
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-02-13 03:02:25 Re: BUG #15623: Inconsistent use of default for updatable view