Re: Multi-language to be or not to be

From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
Date: 2007-02-12 05:11:02
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0702112111q3972827x8797e6a0d03e7c2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 2/11/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Spanish is probably another high percentage language
>
> I would not disagree, *if* more of the international community was
> actually helping keep up with that infrastructure but that isn't why it
> is happening. They are creating their own infrastructure.
>

well actually it was a discussion about that in the spanish list few
month ago... some were talking about creating a new page and the
concensus was to update what historically has been the spanish
postgres page (www.postgresql.cl) but maybe having a translate of the
*oficial* page is better idea...

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Maier 2007-02-12 08:16:31 Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-02-12 04:28:01 Re: Multi-language to be or not to be