Re: Index Tuning Features

From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index Tuning Features
Date: 2006-10-11 05:44:30
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0610102244n11e7407etebb813b2ddfe698d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/10/06, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> wrote:
> I think the idea of "virtual indexes" is pretty interesting, but
> ultimately a lesser solution to a more fundimental issue, and that would
> be "hands on" control over the planner. Estimating the effect of an index
> on a query "prior" to creating the index is a great idea, how that is done
> is something different than building concensus that it should be done.
>
> Another thing that this brings up is "hints" to a query. Over the years, I
> have run into situation where the planner wasn't great. It would be nice
> to try forcing different strategies on the planner and see if performance
> caan be improved.
>

you can do this by setting enable_"access_method" type parameters.

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message George Pavlov 2006-10-11 06:44:56 query log corrupted-looking entries
Previous Message Richard Broersma Jr 2006-10-11 05:31:47 Re: left outer join on multi tables