| From: | "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "David Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax |
| Date: | 2006-05-17 04:59:30 |
| Message-ID: | c2d9e70e0605162159k7cb8da8bqf1ef1274e261ef16@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> (No, I'm not particularly in favor of the BY feature mentioned upthread,
> either.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
mmm... and why is that? i mean, many languages have some way to
increment the for variable by different values... call it STEP, BY or
even i+=number....
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Frost | 2006-05-17 05:09:53 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-17 04:36:09 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |