Re: Q on views and performance

From: "Kynn Jones" <kynnjo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Matthew <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Q on views and performance
Date: 2008-02-25 16:50:44
Message-ID: c2350ba40802250850m2ae1867agbbdc942c3c482d5b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Matthew <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Kynn Jones wrote:
> > Hi. I'm trying to optimize...
> >
> > (Q1) SELECT a1.word, a2.word
> > FROM T a1 JOIN T a2 USING ( zipk )
> > WHERE a1.type = <int1>
> > AND a2.type = <int2>;
>
> Okay, try this:
>
> Create an index on T(type, zipk), and then CLUSTER on that index...

This is just GREAT!!! It fits the problem to a tee.

Many, many thanks!

Also, including zipk in the index is a really nice extra boost. (If you
hadn't mentioned it I would have just settled for clustering only on
type...)

Thanks for that also!

Kynn

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew 2008-02-25 16:56:32 Re: Q on views and performance
Previous Message Joel Stevenson 2008-02-25 16:48:20 Re: LISTEN / NOTIFY performance in 8.3