From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: disable triggers isolated to transaction only? |
Date: | 2010-03-03 15:46:14 |
Message-ID: | c20510f5be73da938956bb41695c73f6@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> My question is this: will ALTER TABLE ONLY $subtable DISABLE TRIGGER
> ALL within a transaction only affect my transaction, or will it affect
> anyone inserting into this subtable. If it blocks external inserts
> that's ok since my transactions are small while moving the data. I
> guess at worse I lock the table.
ALTER TABLE will lock and block, but I'd be remiss if I didn't point
out the use of session_replication_role as a much better solution to
this particular class of problem. (Even if your version does not
support it, Vick, it should be noted here for the archives). The
session_replication_role was added in 8.3:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/sql-altertable.html
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201003031020
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkuOhDYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiPxwCg1JGjrfxvv0gmJDJPGCd2pLdE
X0sAn3t+IYPnAIPcZqqxtBIaUUbkm1jL
=US8W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2010-03-03 15:50:03 | Re: disable triggers isolated to transaction only? |
Previous Message | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo | 2010-03-03 15:41:26 | Re: bug in function arguments "recognition" |