From: | Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: set_ps_display on solaris x86 |
Date: | 2003-02-14 02:31:18 |
Message-ID: | bxysmury4nd.fsf@datafix.CS.Berkeley.EDU |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
Bruce> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> writes:
>> > Sadly, set_ps_display does not seem to have any effect in solaris
>> > x86. At least ps only reports multiple postmaster processes and
>> > arguments.
>>
>> IIRC, you have to use the "other" version of ps to see the process
>> status on Solaris. I forget where it lives exactly, /usr/ucb maybe?
Bruce> Yep, monitoring chapter mentions it:
Thanks !
I was pointed to it by Kevin Brown in private email. He also showed me
how to teach ddd to use the right command as a helper.
Now I need to figure out how to get our sysadmins to make this value a
global change when our students first start ddd - so that they can
easily attach to the right postgres backend while debugging.
--
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-14 03:04:20 | Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-14 02:29:17 | Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Brusser | 2003-02-14 02:33:43 | Re: Do we always need the socket file? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-14 02:29:17 | Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers |