Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?

From: Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers-owner+M38846(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?
Date: 2003-05-14 07:33:59
Message-ID: bxy7k8uugm0.fsf@datafix.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:

>> (2) It's in our interest if things like the Queue/ShMem stuff
>> is part of pgsql as it means one less of a merge hassle in
>> future.

Sean> I'd be quite interested in the work as it would remove my
Sean> dependence on jabberd as a distributed event/message bus and
Sean> I could keep everything inside of PostgreSQL, which is
Sean> always a good thing. :) -sc

Sounds great ! Would it make more sense for us to correspond privately
and see if you can use our code and then submit a patch ?

Or is it better to have a discussion on HACKERS itself and lend itself
to further googling.

--
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2003-05-14 09:09:44 Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-14 03:48:58 Re: Text format protocol representation