Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
Date: 2003-10-10 03:36:17
Message-ID: bm59fh$issbt$1@ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, dwolt(at)iserv(dot)net (Dawn M. Wolthuis) wrote:
> Good question. Although I would want to move away from relational
> databases too, if there is an RDBMS and one wants to query it, what
> would I aim for? If you look at XQuery, you will see an example of
> what I would definitely NOT aim for. Although the user of such a
> language might very well be a technical person, instead of starting
> with mathematics (relational calculus, relational algebra) I would
> suggest starting with language. The mathematics of language is more
> complex than the mathematics of relations, particularly simple
> relations (such as 1NF tables).

No, that _very much_ gets things backwards.

You need to have a clearly defined model of how the data is to be
manipulated before it makes any sense to try to make up a language.
--
output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/rdbms.html
To iterate is human; to recurse, divine.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-10 03:47:14 Re: [HACKERS] Cannot dump/restore text value \N
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-10 03:35:53 Re: rserv and inet data type