Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS

From:	"Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>
To:	pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS
Date:	2003-09-04 23:14:50
Message-ID:	bj8h0o$dq4$1@news.hub.org
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2003-09-04 00:28:26 from "Relaxin" <me(at)yourhouse(dot)com>  2003-09-04 01:05:06 from Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>   2003-09-04 01:24:31 from "Relaxin" <me(at)yourhouse(dot)com>    2003-09-04 03:24:19 from Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>  2003-09-04 01:06:26 from Rudi Starcevic <rudi(at)oasis(dot)net(dot)au>   2003-09-04 01:22:33 from "Relaxin" <me(at)yourhouse(dot)com>    2003-09-04 01:32:38 from Rudi Starcevic <rudi(at)oasis(dot)net(dot)au>     2003-09-04 01:54:37 from Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>    2003-09-04 03:19:22 from Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>     2003-09-04 07:48:42 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>      2003-09-04 08:00:51 from "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>       2003-09-04 08:16:47 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>        2003-09-04 22:58:19 from "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>    2003-09-04 04:43:45 from "Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com>     2003-09-04 05:03:08 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2003-09-04 15:01:13 from Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)nsd(dot)ca>      2003-09-04 15:05:15 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>  2003-09-04 11:01:53 from Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>   2003-09-04 14:35:24 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>    2003-09-04 16:30:09 from Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>     2003-09-04 16:52:29 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>  2003-09-04 17:44:28 from William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>   2003-09-04 23:14:50 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>    2003-09-05 01:26:14 from Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>     2003-09-05 02:13:30 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>      2003-09-05 02:32:23 from Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>       2003-09-05 04:59:01 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>        2003-09-05 04:54:24 from Eirik Oeverby <ltning(at)anduin(dot)net>      2003-09-05 15:05:00 from "Patrick Hatcher" <PHatcher(at)macys(dot)com>       2003-09-05 18:18:35 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>        2003-09-05 21:09:49 from Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>         2003-09-06 00:55:46 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>  2003-09-04 22:28:36 from "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>   2003-09-05 00:45:20 from "Relaxin" <noname(at)spam(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-performance

In response to

• Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS at 2003-09-04 17:44:28 from William Yu

Responses

• Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS at 2003-09-05 01:26:14 from Christopher Browne

Browse pgsql-performance by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2003-09-04 23:16:15	Re: [GENERAL] how to get accurate values in pg_statistic (continued)
Previous Message	scott.marlowe	2003-09-04 22:58:19	Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS