| From: | teknokrat <teknokrat(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: performance of foreign key constraints |
| Date: | 2003-08-28 19:16:59 |
| Message-ID: | bilkf9$p4n$1@news.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Rod Taylor wrote:
>>The references are all to the same table i.e. they are employee ids, so
>>leaving some and not others would make no sense. The table has no
>>deletes, small amount of inserts and moderate amount of updates. However
>>there are many selects and its their performance I am most concerned with.
>
>
> Foreign keys have no impact on selects.
>
> Although this does sound like a rather strange design to me (20+ columns
> wide and they're all employee ids?)
There are more than 20 fieldss. Its a report that can get updated by
different employees and we wish to keep a record of which employee
completed which section. Couldn't think of any other way to do it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-08-28 19:31:23 | Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance tests |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2003-08-28 19:16:11 | Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance |