Re: ERROR: value out of range: underflow

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: rod(at)iol(dot)ie
Cc: Anton Maksimenkov <anton200(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ERROR: value out of range: underflow
Date: 2010-02-26 14:40:00
Message-ID: bddc86151002260640y45338f99sedd4c382116d2787@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 26 February 2010 14:33, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
> On 26/02/2010 12:15, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 26 February 2010 12:02, Anton Maksimenkov <anton200(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I have a simple function.
>>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION myf_convert_phone18digits(
>>>  in_phone VARCHAR
>>> ) RETURNS BIGINT
>>> -- IMMUTABLE
>>> AS $$
>>> DECLARE
>>>  t_extent_len BIGINT;
>>>  t_phone_18 BIGINT;
>>>  t_multiplier BIGINT;
>>> BEGIN
>>>
>>>  IF in_phone IS NULL OR in_phone = '' THEN
>>>        RAISE EXCEPTION 'in_phone[%] IS NULL OR =''''!', in_phone;
>>>  END IF;
>>>
>>>  t_extent_len := 18 - length(in_phone);
>>>  t_multiplier := 10::BIGINT ^ t_extent_len::BIGINT; --<<< ERROR HERE
>>>  t_phone_18 := (in_phone)::BIGINT;
>>>  t_phone_18 := t_phone_18 * t_multiplier;
>>>
>>>  RETURN t_phone_18;
>>>
>>> END;
>>> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>>>
>>>
>>> When I try it in pgAdmin, first time it show me error:
>>> --
>>> ERROR:  value out of range: underflow
>>> CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function "myf_convert_phone18digits" line 12 at assignment
>>> --
>>> SECOND (and consequences) time it works and just show result 771506000000000000
>>>
>>> I get same problem when I try to call query from web (php).
>>> I can't do "second time" here, so web always fail with "ERROR:  value
>>> out of range: underflow"
>>>
>>> What's the problem? What can I do with it?
>>> --
>>> antonvm
>>>
>>
>> If t_extent_len is 19 or more, it will fail as it will exceed the
>> maximum range of bigint.
>
> I'm curious as to why it worked the second time, when invoked twice in a
> row from pgAdmin (assuming that it was called with the same argument -
> the OP didn't say, but I'd imagine that was the case).
>

I'm also curious to know why there's an underflow error instead of
overflow. And in fact, even if a 19 digit phone number were passed
in, it would only result in a 10^-1 calculation, resulting in 0.1.

I think we need to know what value is being passed in to generate this error.

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igor Neyman 2010-02-26 16:24:02 Threads limit for postmaster
Previous Message Raymond O'Donnell 2010-02-26 14:33:34 Re: ERROR: value out of range: underflow