From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | rod(at)iol(dot)ie, Anton Maksimenkov <anton200(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: value out of range: underflow |
Date: | 2010-02-26 18:39:19 |
Message-ID: | 20100226183919.GC3980@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thom Brown escribió:
> On 26 February 2010 14:33, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
> > On 26/02/2010 12:15, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> On 26 February 2010 12:02, Anton Maksimenkov <anton200(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm also curious to know why there's an underflow error instead of
> overflow. And in fact, even if a 19 digit phone number were passed
> in, it would only result in a 10^-1 calculation, resulting in 0.1.
>
> I think we need to know what value is being passed in to generate this error.
If you pass a string longer than 342 chars it fails with an underflow.
Not sure why it doesn't fail the second time, sounds fishy.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Terry | 2010-02-26 20:46:10 | Re: select issue with order v8.1 |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-02-26 17:52:51 | Re: Threads limit for postmaster |