Re: fts, compond words?

From: Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fts, compond words?
Date: 2005-12-07 16:54:43
Message-ID: b918cf3d0512070854h439fdec8pce7c3dd9e587efcf@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/6/05, Marcus Engene <mengpg(at)engene(dot)se> wrote:

[snip]

> A & (B | (New OperatorTheNextWordMustFollow York))
>

Actually, I love that idea. Oleg, would it be possible to create a
tsquery operator that understands proximity? Or, how allowing a
predicate to the current '&' op, as in '&[dist<=1]' meaning "next
token follows with a max distance of 1". I imagine that it would
only be useful on unstripped tsvectors, but if the lexem position is
already stored ...

--
Mike Rylander
mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http://open-ils.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Scholz 2005-12-07 17:01:51 Problem: libpq, network traffic, memory usage
Previous Message Claire McLister 2005-12-07 16:37:09 Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT)