From: | Claus Guttesen <kometen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Best suiting OS |
Date: | 2009-10-05 20:51:50 |
Message-ID: | b41c75520910051351h3dae70a5u8313add18522993@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> Claus Guttesen <kometen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=13001+0+current/freebsd-performance
>
> Not being particularly passionate about any OS, I've been intrigued by
> the FreeBSD benchmarks. However, management is reluctant to use boxes
> which don't have heavily-advertised decals on the front. At the
> moment they're going with IBM X-series boxes, and FreeBSD isn't
> supported, so we'd be on our own. Has anyone had any experience with
> this combination? (In particular, our biggest machines are x3850 M2
> boxes.)
You can download a live-cd and see if it recognizes disk-controller,
nic etc. on HP bce and bge, em GB nics works fine.
> Oh, and of course I dispute the supremacy of vim as an editor -- why
> use that when you've got "ed"? ;-)
I have tried edlin on dos 3 or something like that. But don't recall
the commands! :-)
--
regards
Claus
When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentler gamester is the soonest winner.
Shakespeare
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-10-05 21:32:14 | Re: Speed / Server |
Previous Message | Axel Rau | 2009-10-05 20:27:46 | Re: Best suiting OS |