Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Date: 2016-09-13 04:48:57
Message-ID: b2d46ab4-62f9-4d54-98cf-cf4f05cbe2f0@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/09/09 18:47, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> A related change is renaming RangeBound structure in Amit
> Langote's patches to PartitionRangeBound to avoid name conflict with
> rangetypes.h. That change too should vanish once we decide where to keep
> that structure and its final name.

This change has been incorporated into the latest patch I posted on Sep 9 [1].

Thanks,
Amit

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28ee345c-1278-700e-39a7-36a71f9a3b43@lab.ntt.co.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-09-13 05:17:01 Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-13 04:16:58 Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)